I’ll admit, there is not much that can happen in a classroom that puts a smile on my face faster than walking in to see students circled up having a discussion about a shared text. To me, that is the essence of what a school should be.
That is exactly what I saw earlier this week when I walked into one of our Spanish classrooms in the high school. I settled in to listen. This circle discussion was not necessarily what I would call a classic Socratic Seminar, as the teacher was still facilitating the discussion, but she was doing so with tremendous skill. Students were universally engaged in the discussion, and I quickly noticed a number of other strategies being employed by the teacher to ensure a high quality, cognitively rigorous conversation. First, each student had an iPad on their lap, open to the poem in question. It was very clear that all of the students had spent some time reading and wrestling with the poem’s meaning, as each copy had annotations in the margins and highlighted sections. Annotating text, talking to the text, or whatever you commonly call it, is an essential practice in a literacy classroom (hint: all classrooms are literacy classrooms). The teacher was also strategically cold calling students. Cold calling is a simple classroom management strategy, but it is a powerful one. For those teachers who use it regularly, they quickly build an academic culture where all students know they are accountable for engaging with the lesson, as they could be called upon at any time to contribute. Perhaps it is subtle classroom psychology, but when a student knows he or she might be called on anyway, they seem more willing to contribute willfully, without being called on. That is what I was seeing. Lots of spontaneous contributions and exchanges amongst students, with the teacher there to bring students on the fringes into the conversation.
Honestly, seeing students in a circle in a classroom almost seems like an act of pedagogical defiance. The square room, the square tables (especially in pandemic mode), and all those right angles sometimes scream for predictability and order. But then you have students in a circle, engaging in spontaneous conversation around a shared text. Instead of being oriented to the teacher, students are in communication with each other, with the physical cues that everyone in the space has something to contribute. It’s Arthur’s Round Table in the learning context, where no opinion is inherently weightier than any other, perhaps only on the merits of the opinion and corresponding evidence itself.
It probably would not be surprising that when given the chance to work with a team to design the high school of the future, we settled on the name “Circulos” (“Circles” in Spanish) for the school. There is so much beauty and power when students are engaged in authentic conversation and discourse with each other, and we couldn’t resist making that the signature pedagogy of the school. A multi-million dollar grant and lots of blood, sweat and tears later, and the design became a reality. At Círculos, the idea of the circle discussion moved out more broadly to include the idea of expanding students’ social capital by enlarging their network or circle to include community organizers, working professionals, and other potential allies who could enrich the educational experience of each student.
The beautiful thing is you don’t need a special school to harness one of the most powerful pedagogies available. It only takes a few moments to circle up and be drawn in to deep, substantial conversations. In a world where discussion is increasingly linear and uni-directional, we could all use a little more circle time.